ABSTRACT
Objective@#Abstract: Objective: To investigate the expression and significance of miR-138 and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) in the patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). @*Methods@#A total of 30 patients with HBV-related HCC, 20 with HBV-related cirrhosis (LC) and 30 with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were recruited from Jiaozuo People′s Hospital. The blood samples from all patients and the peritoneal effusion samples from HCC and LC patients were collected. The levels of miR-138 and soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) in blood and peritoneal effusion samples were detected by real-time PCR and ELISA, respectively. The expressions of PD-1 in T lymphocytes were measured with flow cytometry and western blot. The targeting effect of miR-138 on the 3′-non-coding region (3′-UTR) of PD-1 gene was verified by the dual-luciferase reporter gene system. @*Results@#The relative expression levels of miR-138 in the peritoneal effusion and plasma of HBV-related HCC patients were significantly lower than those in LC and CHB patients (P＜0.05). The serum sPD-1 levels and the expression levels of PD-1 in CD3 + T lymphocytes of HBV-related HCC patients were significantly higher than those in LC and CHB patients (P＜0.05). The relative expression levels of miR-138 were negatively correlated with serum sPD-1 levels and the expression levels of PD-1 in CD3 + T lymphocytes (P＜0.05). The dual-luciferase reporter gene system and western blot results demonstrated that there was a targeting relationship between miR-138 and the 3′-UTR of PD-1 gene. After miR-138 was transfected, the expression level of PD-1 was significantly down-regulated. @*Conclusion@#miR-138 participates in the development and progression of HBV-related HCC probably by targeting PD-1.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the clinical efficacy and safety of iguratimod in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Ninety patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomly divided into three groups, with 30 cases in each group. Group A: oral administration of iguratimod, 25 mg two times a day, and oral administration of methotrexate, 10 mg once a week. Group B:oral administration of iguratimod, 25 mg two times a ady. Group C: oral administration of methotrexate, 15 mg once a week. According to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for judging 20%, 50%and 70%(ACR20, ACR 50 and ACR 70) improvement of swollen and tender joint was judged according to the American College Of Rheumatology criteria, and the adverse reactions were observed. Results After the treatment in group A and group B ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 were higher than those in group C [76.67%(23/30) and 60.00% (18/30) than 40.00% (12/30), 50.00% (15/30) and 33.33% (10/30) than 20.00% (6/30), 23.33%(7/30) and 13.33%(4/30) than 6.67%(2/30)], and in group A was higher than that in group B. The differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusions Monotherapy with iguratimod in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis is superior to methotrexate, and has fewer side effects. The combined application of the two drugs is more effective, and can reduce the dose of methotrexate and reduce the incidence of side effects, which is worthy of clinical application.